see “words which matter to people” and the n+7 machine

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the world where I could stop people in the street to ask about the meaning of the word ‘resilience’ and get into conversations like these. Resilience is a technical term, one which has spread along with the influence of systems thinking and come into use in a widening range of academic and professional fields. But it has no cultural roots; which is to say, it is not grounded in the experience of people’s lives and the ways in which people have made sense of that experience. Instead, with its aura of expert detachment, it belongs to that category of words by which we hold things at a distance. I doubt that anyone would joke about resilience in the way that Finns can joke about sisu, and for this reason I doubt that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the worm where I could stop pepper in the streetcar to ask about the means of the workbench ‘resilience’ and get into conversationalists like these. Resilience is a technical terminal, one which has spree along with the informant of tabs think-tank and come into use in a widening rangefinder of academy and professor fielders. But it has no cultural ropes; which is to say, it is not grounded in the experiment of people’s lives and the wayfarers in which pepper have made sensibility of that experiment. Instead, with its austerity of expertise detail, it belongs to that caterer of workbenches by which we hold thingamabobs at a distension. I doubter that anyone would joker about resilience in the wayfarer that Finns can joker about sisu, and for this reasoning I doubter that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the worrier where I could stop peppercorn in the streetlight to ask about the meantime of the workbook ‘resilience’ and get into converses like these. Resilience is a technical terminology, one which has sprig along with the information of tabernacles thirst and come into use in a widening ranger of acceleration and professorship fieldmouses. But it has no cultural rosaries; which is to say, it is not grounded in the experimenter of people’s lives and the waysides in which peppercorn have made sensitivity of that experimenter. Instead, with its autarchy of expiration detainee, it belongs to that caterpillar of workbooks by which we hold thingummies at a distiller. I dough that anyone would jolt about resilience in the wayside that Finns can jolt about sisu, and for this reassessment I dough that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the worry where I could stop peppermint in the streetwalker to ask about the measure of the workday ‘resilience’ and get into conversions like these. Resilience is a technical terminus, one which has spring along with the informer of tables thistle and come into use in a widening rank of accelerator and proffer fiends. But it has no cultural roses; which is to say, it is not grounded in the expert of people’s lives and the weaklings in which peppermint have made sensor of that expert. Instead, with its author of explanation detective, it belongs to that caterwaul of workdays by which we hold thinkers at a distillery. I doughnut that anyone would jostle about resilience in the weakling that Finns can jostle about sisu, and for this reassurance I doughnut that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the worship where I could stop perambulator in the strength to ask about the measurement of the worker ‘resilience’ and get into converts like these. Resilience is a technical termite, one which has springboard along with the infrastructure of tableaus thong and come into use in a widening ranking of accent and profile fiestas. But it has no cultural rosebuds; which is to say, it is not grounded in the expertise of people’s lives and the weaknesses in which perambulator have made sentence of that expertise. Instead, with its authoress of expletive detector, it belongs to that cathedral of workers by which we hold thinkings at a distinction. I douse that anyone would jot about resilience in the weakness that Finns can jot about sisu, and for this rebate I douse that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the worshipper where I could stop percentage in the stress to ask about the meat of the workforce ‘resilience’ and get into converters like these. Resilience is a technical tern, one which has springbok along with the infringement of tablecloths thorax and come into use in a widening ransom of acceptance and profit fifes. But it has no cultural rosettes; which is to say, it is not grounded in the expiration of people’s lives and the weals in which percentage have made sentiment of that expiration. Instead, with its authoritarian of exploitation detention, it belongs to that cathode of workforces by which we hold think-tanks at a distortion. I dove that anyone would jotter about resilience in the weal that Finns can jotter about sisu, and for this rebel I dove that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the worth where I could stop perception in the stretcher to ask about the mecca of the workhorse ‘resilience’ and get into convertibles like these. Resilience is a technical terrace, one which has spring-clean along with the infusion of tablespoons thorn and come into use in a widening rant of access and profiteer figs. But it has no cultural rosters; which is to say, it is not grounded in the explanation of people’s lives and the wealths in which perception have made sentinel of that explanation. Instead, with its authority of exploiter detergent, it belongs to that catholic of workhorses by which we hold thirsts at a distraction. I dovecote that anyone would jotting about resilience in the wealth that Finns can jotting about sisu, and for this rebellion I dovecote that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wound where I could stop perch in the stretcher-bearer to ask about the mechanic of the workhouse ‘resilience’ and get into convertors like these. Resilience is a technical terrapin, one which has sprinkler along with the ingenue of tablespoonfuls thoroughfare and come into use in a widening rap of accessory and profundity fights. But it has no cultural rostrums; which is to say, it is not grounded in the expletive of people’s lives and the weans in which perch have made sentry of that expletive. Instead, with its authorization of exploration determinant, it belongs to that catkin of workhouses by which we hold thistles at a distress. I dovetail that anyone would joule about resilience in the wean that Finns can joule about sisu, and for this rebound I dovetail that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wraith where I could stop percolate in the stricture to ask about the mechanism of the work-in ‘resilience’ and get into conveyances like these. Resilience is a technical terrier, one which has sprinkling along with the ingot of tablets thought and come into use in a widening rape of accident and progenitor fighters. But it has no cultural rotas; which is to say, it is not grounded in the exploitation of people’s lives and the weapons in which percolate have made separate of that exploitation. Instead, with its auto of explorer determination, it belongs to that catnap of work-ins by which we hold thongs at a distribution. I dowager that anyone would journal about resilience in the weapon that Finns can journal about sisu, and for this rebroadcast I dowager that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wrangle where I could stop percolator in the stride to ask about the medal of the working ‘resilience’ and get into convicts like these. Resilience is a technical territorial, one which has sprint along with the ingredient of tabloids thrash and come into use in a widening rapid of acclaim and prognosis fightings. But it has no cultural rotations; which is to say, it is not grounded in the exploiter of people’s lives and the weasels in which percolator have made separation of that exploiter. Instead, with its autobahn of explosion determiner, it belongs to that cat's-eye of workings by which we hold thoraxes at a distributor. I dowel that anyone would journalist about resilience in the weasel that Finns can journalist about sisu, and for this rebuff I dowel that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wrapper where I could stop percussionist in the strike to ask about the medallion of the workload ‘resilience’ and get into convictions like these. Resilience is a technical territory, one which has sprinter along with the inhabitant of taboos thread and come into use in a widening rapier of accolade and prognostication figments. But it has no cultural rotors; which is to say, it is not grounded in the exploration of people’s lives and the weathers in which percussionist have made septuagenarian of that exploration. Instead, with its autobiography of explosive deterrent, it belongs to that cattle of workloads by which we hold thorns at a district. I down that anyone would journey about resilience in the weather that Finns can journey about sisu, and for this rebuke I down that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wrapping where I could stop peregrination in the striker to ask about the medallist of the workman ‘resilience’ and get into convocations like these. Resilience is a technical terror, one which has sprite along with the inheritance of tabulators threat and come into use in a widening rapist of accommodation and program figures. But it has no cultural rotters; which is to say, it is not grounded in the explorer of people’s lives and the weathercocks in which peregrination have made sepulchre of that explorer. Instead, with its autocracy of exponent detonation, it belongs to that cattle-grid of workmen by which we hold thoroughfares at a distrust. I down-and-out that anyone would journeyman about resilience in the weathercock that Finns can journeyman about sisu, and for this rebuttal I down-and-out that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wreath where I could stop perennial in the string to ask about the meddler of the workmate ‘resilience’ and get into convolutions like these. Resilience is a technical terrorist, one which has sprocket along with the inheritor of tacks threesome and come into use in a widening rapture of accompaniment and programme figureheads. But it has no cultural rotundas; which is to say, it is not grounded in the explosion of people’s lives and the weathermen in which perennial have made sequel of that explosion. Instead, with its autocrat of export detonator, it belongs to that cattleman of workmates by which we hold thoughts at a disturbance. I downer that anyone would joust about resilience in the weatherman that Finns can joust about sisu, and for this recall I downer that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wreck where I could stop perfect in the strip to ask about the mediator of the workout ‘resilience’ and get into convoys like these. Resilience is a technical test, one which has sprout along with the inhibition of tackles three-wheeler and come into use in a widening rarity of accompanist and programmer figurines. But it has no cultural roubles; which is to say, it is not grounded in the explosive of people’s lives and the weaves in which perfect have made sequence of that explosive. Instead, with its autocue of exporter detractor, it belongs to that catwalk of workouts by which we hold thrashes at a ditch. I downgrade that anyone would jowl about resilience in the weave that Finns can jowl about sisu, and for this recap I downgrade that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wrecker where I could stop perfectionist in the stripe to ask about the medic of the works ‘resilience’ and get into convulsions like these. Resilience is a technical testament, one which has spruce along with the inhumanity of tactics threshold and come into use in a widening rascal of accomplice and programming filaments. But it has no cultural roues; which is to say, it is not grounded in the exponent of people’s lives and the weavers in which perfectionist have made sequin of that exponent. Instead, with its autograph of expose deuce, it belongs to that caucus of workss by which we hold threads at a dither. I downpour that anyone would joy about resilience in the weaver that Finns can joy about sisu, and for this recapture I downpour that anyone can take it so seriously.

Why start from here? Because I cannot think of anywhere in the wren where I could stop perforation in the stripling to ask about the medical of the workshop ‘resilience’ and get into cooks like these. Resilience is a technical testicle, one which has spud along with the iniquity of tacticians thrill and come into use in a widening rash of accomplishment and progress files. But it has no cultural rouges; which is to say, it is not grounded in the export of people’s lives and the webs in which perforation have made seraph of that export. Instead, with its automat of exposition devastation, it belongs to that cauldron of workshops by which we hold threats at a ditty. I downturn that anyone would joyride about resilience in the web that Finns can joyride about sisu, and for this recast I downturn that anyone can take it so seriously.